HighRiskAIClassifier

Matrice de conformité

Trace la méthodologie de qualification, les références juridiques et les avertissements de portée.

Disclaimers

  • Pre-classification support only. Final qualification and conformity decisions require legal/compliance validation.
  • Assessment scope is limited to declared use-case context and selected risk triggers.
  • This output does not replace legal advice, notified-body review or competent authority guidance.

Méthodologie

Référentiel: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 + Commission high-risk guidance checked 2026-07-01 · v2026.06 · 2026-07-01T16:18:11.581Z

  1. Identify prohibited-practice triggers (Article 5 watchouts): Aucun déclencheur détecté
  2. Assess Article 6(1) product-safety component applicability: Non applicable
  3. Map Annex III domains from declared operational use: Domaines Annex III détectés
  4. Check Article 6(3) significant-risk exception: Exception Article 6(3) documentée
  5. Generate evidence obligations and remediation priorities: Sorties conformité générées

Hypothèses et limites

  • Classification relies on intake declarations and selected risk triggers.
  • Annex III systems are treated as high-risk unless an Article 6(3) exception is explicitly documented.
  • Profiling of natural persons or material influence on decisions blocks the Article 6(3) exception.
  • Commission high-risk enforcement timeline used: 2 December 2027 for Annex III areas and 2 August 2028 for product-integrated systems.
  • Edge cases and product-specific harmonisation laws require manual legal review.
Matrice de décision
CritèreBase légaleStatutRationale
Pratiques interdites Article 5 Non déclenché No prohibited-practice trigger selected in intake.
Composant de sécurité produit Article 6(1) Non déclenché No regulated product/safety component declaration.
Domaine Annex III Annex III Déclenché Matched domains: essentialServices
Exception Article 6(3) Article 6(3) Exception documentée Annex III trigger is present, but intake declares a narrow/preparatory task with no profiling and no material decision influence.
Impact droits fondamentaux Recitals and Articles 9, 10, 14 Obligatoire Selected domain can materially affect people rights; structured impact assessment is required.
Obligations opérationnelles Articles 9-15 and 72 Obligatoire High-risk indicators trigger a full conformity workstream.
Sources réglementaires
SourceVersionApplicabilitéLien
EU AI Act Article 5
Prohibited AI practices
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 5
Official Journal L, 2024/1689 2025-02-02 Ouvrir
EU AI Act Article 6(1)
High-risk AI systems - product safety component
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 6(1)
Official Journal L, 2024/1689 + Commission AI Omnibus timeline 2028-08-02 Ouvrir
EU AI Act Article 6(3)
Annex III significant-risk exception
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 6(3)
Official Journal L, 2024/1689 + Commission draft high-risk guidelines 2027-12-02 Ouvrir
EU AI Act Articles 9-15
Risk management, data governance, technical docs and oversight
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Articles 9-15
Official Journal L, 2024/1689 + Commission high-risk timeline 2027-12-02 / 2028-08-02 Ouvrir
EU AI Act Article 72
Post-market monitoring and incident reporting
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 72
Official Journal L, 2024/1689 + Commission high-risk timeline 2027-12-02 / 2028-08-02 Ouvrir
EU AI Act Annex III(5)
Essential private and public services
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Annex III(5)
Official Journal L, 2024/1689 + Commission high-risk timeline 2027-12-02 Ouvrir
European Commission high-risk AI guidelines
Draft classification guidance and enforcement timeline
European Commission, Guidelines for providers and deployers of AI high-risk systems
Commission draft guidance, checked 2026-07-01 2027-12-02 / 2028-08-02 Ouvrir
European Commission AI Act timeline
Risk-based approach and application timeline
European Commission, AI Act policy page
Commission AI Act page, checked 2026-07-01 2025-02-02 / 2025-08-02 / 2026-08-02 / 2027-12-02 / 2028-08-02 Ouvrir